In January 2014, 102 measles cases linked to an outbreak at Disneyland were reported in 14 states. The outbreak alarmed the CDC, which declared the disease eliminated in the U.S. in the year 2000. Many health officials have tied the outbreak to the rising number of unvaccinated children under the age of 12. Proponents of a mandate argue that vaccines are necessary in order to insure herd immunity against preventable diseases. Herd immunity protects people who are unable to get vaccines due to their age or health condition. Opponents of a mandate believe the government should not be able to decide which vaccines their children should receive. Some opponents also believe there is a link between vaccinations and autism and vaccinating their children will have destructive consequences on their early childhood development.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
@8YZTXJB3yrs3Y
Yes, but this should be limited to vaccines that are not considered an ‘experimental drug’.
@8Q9PRKM4yrs4Y
I think that kids should be vaccinated, but there are some kids who have severe allergies and, of course, the kids whose religious beliefs prevent them from getting vaccines. I think it really just depends on what kid gets vaccines.
@8QBK7HP4yrs4Y
It is up to the child's parents
@5643HNN4yrs4Y
Yes, unless the child has an allergy to the ingredients (ex, egg whites); the more vaccinated people, the more effective herd immunity is for those that can't be vaccinated
@929DQCT3yrs3Y
No because it's like drugging someone without anything happening to someone. Even there is nothing wrong with the with children, they shouldn't have to be force to get vaccinated.
@8LGHYLR4yrs4Y
Yes, with the exception of those who are immunocompromised.
@73CH9DV4yrs4Y
Yes, unless they already have permanent immunity
@83WFRPW4yrs4Y
No, but is allowed only for deadly contagious diseases and if the child wants to.
@8CK9LVK5yrs5Y
I think they should give it to families for free, but only if they want it.
@8F4ZGL34yrs4Y
Yes, in order to attend public school. With the exception to those who have medical issues where they can't be vaccinated and to those who are a part of a religion that is against vaccines.
@awntkmess4yrs4Y
Yes, but with expectations for religious beliefs and medical issues
@8HQTH284yrs4Y
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children, but I think respecting someone's religious practices is important too.
@8JB9QW64yrs4Y
Yes, but only if they will be free and accessible
@8JP729G4yrs4Y
I think parents should be able to pick for their children whether or not to get one.
@8KRSKYV4yrs4Y
Sometimes its against religoins to vacinate, so I say no. However if people dont vacinate, they cant blame the goverment for it.
@8W29XZ43yrs3Y
no, if it is not medically safe for them
@8RJ67984yrs4Y
yes and no because everyone have there own opinion
@8VMDYFN3yrs3Y
Yes, if the government makes vaccines accessible for all people.
@8WM2X5S3yrs3Y
If they’re parents allow and them
@8X9YW9D3yrs3Y
Yes, but not for the covid vaccine and the flu-shot
@8YBNY7N3yrs3Y
if the parents agree then yes ,but if not no
@8Z7PTXF3yrs3Y
@8ZGPKLQ3yrs3Y
yes if the do not follow the rules but if they are following the rules and not harming other people i do not think it should matter, if their vaccinated or not.
Join in on more popular conversations.
